I was watching a short clip the
other day of a man talking about the recent deaths of two black men by police
officers and he also mentioned the attacks on the police officers in Dallas, he
then condemned all violence – and how it has to stop.
He then said, police officers
have to stop the mentality of ‘shoot to kill.’
It was obvious he was distressed and sincere on wanting to see violence
curbed.
But it was just as obvious that
he didn’t know anything about the training officers go through and why ‘shoot to
kill’ is not a term, but ‘shoot to stop the threat’ is what needs to be
done.
Yes, there was a time when that
phrase was used. It was used because
when an officer pulls his gun he needs to fully understand that if he pulls the
trigger someone could die.
He/She is trained to shoot for
the body mass because that is what is most likely going to be needed to stop the
person from using or continuing to use deadly force. People who think that the officer should
shoot for arms or legs or shoot the gun out of the suspect hands is what should
be done have watched too many movies.
The reality is quite different.
Any time an officer pulls a gun
the adrenaline starts flowing – the officer knows that there is danger and the
weapon in hand may be the only answer to it.
Often the display of the gun is sufficient to get people’s attention, but
it if is not and the trigger must be pulled it is because the threat of violence
from the suspect is imminent.
If it is that serious then a
shot to the body mass gives the officer the best chance to stop the threat and
protect innocent lives.
But it is more than just use of
a gun. People do not know what an
officer does. They may have ideas but
until they have been in a squad car, on a busy night in a busy and crime ridden
area they have no real life experiences to base their ideas on.
I hear and read over and over
again that the officers need to put themselves in the place of people of color;
that they have no idea what it is like to be a black person stopped by an
officer.
I do understand that perception,
however, the leaders of these movements, leaders in the communities, especially
those that have high profiles, need to ride a few nights with officers to see,
from the officer’s standpoint, what is going on in their cities. They may think they know, but officers see
things that most citizens don’t and have no idea what is happening in their
communities.
Almost every department has some
kind of ride along policy and it would be very easy for these people to get that
first-hand experience.
It also wouldn’t hurt for them
to go through the shoot, don’t shoot scenarios that officers must go
through. They would see how the officer
often times only has split seconds to make a decision and if it is the wrong one
they could be killed.
The media and many organizations
are focused on what the police are doing wrong – but have no idea what it is
like to stop a car load of people (no matter the color) at night in a high crime
scene area. Until they understand what
the officer goes through in those and other situations they are not being part
of the solution, they are part of the problem.
In all this rhetoric I see where
the police are being blamed for everything, but I don’t see where parents and
society in general are taking any responsibility for the criminals that are
creating havoc in the street and forcing the officers to use deadly force.
Before our ‘leaders’ talk about
how we must pull together, how we must look at all officers as the bad guy –
they should spend a few nights working family violence cases, fights, responding
to calls for help, stopping cars on dark streets in dangerous neighborhoods
among the many type calls and activities officers handle on a regular basis.
Until they do, they have no
business telling police officers they are too irresponsible and poorly
trained.
Psalm
16:1 Preserve me, O God: for in thee do I put
my trust.
Hebrews
11:1 Now faith is the substance of things
hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.
Mathew
17:19-21 Then came the disciples to Jesus
apart, and said, Why could not we cast him
out?
20 And Jesus said unto
them, Because of your unbelief: for verily I say unto you, If ye have faith as a
grain of mustard seed, ye shall say unto this mountain, Remove hence to yonder
place; and it shall remove; and nothing shall be impossible unto
you.
21 Howbeit this kind goeth
not out but by prayer and fasting.
Why do we pray?
I would say, because we are
asking God to do something, either for us or someone else.
But are we expecting God to do
something, or are we just going through the motions without any real
anticipation of an answer?
Do we have faith that God will
act upon our request, or, again, do we do it out of tradition, because we are
expected to pray – but, we don’t really think it will be answered or do any
good?
When I was a boy, no, from my
parents meant, NO. I learned quickly
that getting a no from one of them and then going to the other to get what I
wanted could lead to a good spanking.
No, meant no. I grew up with that. That is the way we raised our children,
whining or asking, repeatedly only made my resolve firmer. I know I wasn’t always right and sometimes we
reversed the decision after thinking about it or talking it over with Carla –
who, by the way also said no, meant no.
But I often find myself in that
same mindset when I go to God in prayer, asking for His intervention, or
assistance in one thing or another. I
figure that if I ask and don’t see His hand, then it is enough, I will not keep
‘bugging’ Him for an answer.
But I also realize that is not
always how He works. If I am asking out
of obligation, rather than sincere desire for His guidance and help, then am I
really praying, in faith?
Is it laziness that I don’t
continue in prayer for certain things?
Do I not have the true belief
that God will answer my prayer in an affirmative manner (at least what I deem is
good?)
O God: for in
thee do I put my trust.
Do I believe that I can truly
trust in God, or am I just going through the gestures because that is what we
are ‘supposed to do?
God has many conditions He puts
on His response to prayer, they aren’t difficult, but we often let ourselves
down because we do not follow them.
Are we asking from a heart that
is truly obedient to Him? Are we asking
for something that falls within the framework of what is acceptable to Him? Are we asking in faith, believing that He has
the ability to answer our prayers – and that He will?
There are several others, of
course, but they all come down to us having trust in God and that He responds in
an appropriate manner no matter how he responds.
But while I don’t believe in
‘bugging’ the Lord, I also understand that sometimes there is a need for more
than one time praying - goeth not out but by prayer and
fasting.
Jesus is clearly saying not only
is it okay to ask God to intervene, heal, perform a miracle, or the many other
things that we ask for, sometimes we must ask more than once, sometimes we must
not only pray but fast.
Jesus spent hours in prayer, He
believed in them and He had faith in God to do what must be done. His prayers were conversations with God,
where not only did He say what He wanted to say, but He listened to what God
said to Him and we should follow His example.
I need to truly believe in God,
trust in Him, and have faith in Him. Far
too often I have asked God to help me, and then went off, immediately and did
what I thought was best.
There are times that we have but
a moment to pray and ask for His help, but most of the time we have minutes,
hours, days, weeks or longer to listen to Him and to have faith that He will
guide us in what we need to do, that He will indeed let us know His answer.
Later, Art :-)